Several factors are fueling adoption of ICHRAs. For many employers, cost control is top of mind. By setting a defined contribution toward coverage, organizations can create more predictable benefits budgets while giving employees the freedom to shop for a plan that works best for them.
Flexibility is another key advantage, especially for companies with employees spread across multiple states or regions. Rather than juggling the complexities of different group plans with varying provider networks, employers can offer an ICHRA that adapts seamlessly to diverse geographies.
Equally important is the employee experience. Workers increasingly expect benefits that reflect their individual needs, and ICHRAs empower them to choose ACA-compliant plans that align with their health, financial, and family situations. This emphasis on personalization fits squarely within the broader trend toward consumer-driven health and wealth benefits.
There’s also been encouraging legislative momentum around ICHRAs. In 2025, congressional proposals aimed to elevate ICHRAs from regulatory constructs to statutory fixtures — rebranding them as “CHOICE Arrangements” (Custom Health Option and Individual Care Expense) and introducing valuable efficiencies and incentives, including codification into law, shorter notice periods, pre-tax cafeteria election capability, and small employer tax credits.
However, not all of these enhancements made it into the final version of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. The CHOICE provisions and rebranding ultimately didn’t survive revisions and were removed before the law was enacted. The resulting legislation, while advancing other priorities, stopped short of providing the long-term statutory certainty that ICHRAs’ proponents sought.
That said, these provisions are far from forgotten. Many observers anticipate that proposed ICHRA enhancements may be reintroduced in the next Congress session as lawmakers continue to explore ways to modernize benefit delivery and expand access to flexible coverage models.
Taken together, the legislative conversation has highlighted areas where ICHRA could evolve. Yet for now, its long-term future remains entrenched in administrative regulation rather than statutory permanence.